Restoring America’s Wounded: Advanced Surgical Technique Research
By: Laura Curtin, FHP&R Staff Writer
Use
of improvised explosive devices
in Iraq and Afghanistan has caused a
marked increase in severe blast trauma, but
today’s military medical care has allowed
many of the injured to survive. In fact,
approximately 90 percent of the wounded
survive serious injuries sustained on the
battlefield.
“Survival rate… is thanks to research in
combat casualty care, the great medical
care we have in theatre, plus the military’s
phenomenal evacuation system [from the
battlefield],” Col. Jan Harris said. Col.
Harris is a science manager for Department
of Defense (DoD) funded research
projects within clinical and rehabilitative
medicine. This general area of research is
specifically for the purpose of restoring
function and quality of life to America’s
wounded through advanced therapies.
Returning Service members to duty and
helping them lead productive and fulfilling
lives are of critical importance to the
military and medical communities. There
are many research investigations occurring
to advance rehabilitation of the injured.
Some research studies within the clinical
and rehabilitative medicine portfolio work
with prosthetics and amputee care; others
focus on repairing vision, mitigating chronic
pain, regenerative medicine techniques,
and healing burns. One study specifically
focuses on improving appearance and
quality of life for civilians and Service
members who have experienced facial
trauma.
U.S. Navy Machinist’s Mate 1st Class Michael Lammey and his wife look at the ribbons he has earned during his Navy career at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio, Texas, Aug. 12, 2009. Lammey is recovering at the hospital after being burned when a boiler exploded aboard the submarine tender USS Frank Cable (AS 40). (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Jhi L. Scott/Released)
Service members are returning from
the battlefield with limb, head, face, and
other injuries that can take years to treat.
These injuries can result in significant
lifelong impairment, but with the help of
researchers, recovery may include more
options as techniques improve and medical
science evolves.
Low Risk and Minimally Invasive Surgery
A very severe facial trauma typically
requires 30 to 40 surgeries just to close
wounds and allow some functionality. In
some cases the individual is left with a
severely disfigured face. Even less severe
facial trauma can leave behind scars. Visible
facial injuries can impact the ability to
integrate back into society, affecting both
personal relationships and employment
opportunities. While current medical
procedures can do a lot to reconstruct
these injuries, physicians consistently strive
to find better ways to accurately restore
facial features.
One method under investigation is called
structural fat grafting for craniofacial trauma.
The fat grafting technique is a common
cosmetic and reconstructive procedure, and
was performed approximately 65,000 times
by plastic surgeons in the United States last
year. Fat grafting, in this particular case,
is where the surgeon transfers excess fat
deposits from other areas of the body to
the injured face. Using a very specialized
technique, this low risk and minimally
invasive procedure adds contour to the
injured face. The wounded person’s physical
appearance can typically improve after this
outpatient procedure.
Dr. J. Peter Rubin is an associate professor of
plastic surgery for the McGowan Institute of
Regenerative Medicine at the University of
Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Dr. Rubin
currently serves as a principal investigator
of DoD-funded research that strives to
accurately restore wounded warriors after
combat related injury.
Dr. Rubin’s fat grafting project utilizes
specialized instruments to inject fat into
scar tissue planes at the exact site of
injury to offer an improved aesthetic
appearance for the patient. Reconstructive
and cosmetic procedures can increase the
volume and shape of the injured body site.
The best technical ability and guidance are
administered to accomplish the surgery.
Dr. Rubin explains that “the area of
investigation is to see how well the
specialized technique lasts over time,
as injected fat can lose volume. We
measure volume of the fat graft with high
definition CT scan and 3D typography. A
psychologist works with participants at
every point of the process to assess quality
of life immediately after the battlefield
injury, in preparation for the procedure and
again after the surgery.”
Important project goals include validating
the treatment and then educating military
physicians on the specialized technique
for use at military treatment facilities. Also
important to the research study is if the
Service members’ perception of quality of
life improves after the procedure.
In September, the fat grafting study had
begun treatment for approximately 10
of the 20 total participants approved for
the study. Patient enrollment is ongoing
until all 20 patients have been identified;
viable candidates are those with any visible
deformity of the face or head at least
three months into recovery from the initial
facial trauma. Men and women who are
active duty or former members of the
United States Military may be eligible.
Prior surgery of the face or skull does not
prevent participation in this study, as fat
grafting is often used to further improve
the results after other surgical procedures.
For more information about this study,
please contact Ms. Carlynn Graves by email
at crj9@pitt.edu.
“I think that it is the soft tissue overlying
the bones and skull that gives humans the
most recognizable traits, which injury [to
the face] seriously changes. This outpatient
procedure has the potential to make a big
difference in appearance and integration
back to society,” Dr. Rubin said.
About DoD’s Research Investment Initiatives
The DoD’s Office of Force Health
Protection & Readiness manages a
portion of the DoD’s investment in
medical research and development.
Specifically, the Defense Medical Research
and Development Program (DMRDP)
manages research, development, testing,
and evaluation plans for using Defense
Health Program (DHP) funding.
Within the DMRDP are six major research
portfolios that address a variety of
operational needs in research. DMRDP
is involved with directing science that
addresses wounded warrior focus topics
outlined by the Secretary of Defense. These
important areas include traumatic brain
injury (TBI), post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD), prosthetics, eye injury, and other
deployment and battlefield injuries.
Each research portfolio is managed
by joint program committee teams
of experienced medical and military
personnel. Col. Harris chairs one of the
six joint program committees within the
DMRDP – the Clinical and Rehabilitative
Medicine (CRM) portfolio. CRM focuses
on methods for restoring and rehabilitating
war injuries.
Main areas of the CRM portfolio are
neuromusculoskeletal injury, acute and
chronic pain, regenerative medicine, and
sensory system traumatic injury. The
DHP investment for this portfolio area is
currently funding many research studies
along with several clinical trials. Related
research projects are funded through the
Services, other government agencies,
academic institutions and industry.
A large collaborative group executes clinical
trials. “Four military treatment facilities
are part of a large clinical consortium.
It includes Walter Reed Army Medical
Center, San Antonio Military Medical
Center, Navy Medical Center San Diego,
and Navy Medical Center Portsmouth,”
Col. Jan Harris explained.
The CRM portfolio also includes
research efforts that are directed at
TBI-related sensory dysfunction (such
as visual and hearing dysfunction), and
cognitive rehabilitation in the context
of TBI. CRM encompasses fundamental
research to better understand both injury
and healing mechanisms through clinical
trials. The clinical trials aid in establishing
safety and effectiveness of new products
and treatment strategies. The DoD’s
research investments offer hope not
just for wounded Service members, but
also for the broad medical community
in finding improved methods for better
patient healing.
|